ActionScript 4?? by Colin Moock

Colin Moock started off his FITC presentation quite differently, by starting it off joking that people should skip his session and go check out Evan Roth's presentation next door. He even gave a quick summary of his presentation and said he wouldn't be insulted if anyone left. One person did get up to leave and Colin asked if he was going to see Evan's presentation, when the guy answered "yes", Colin gave him a free copy of his AS3 book and told the guy to tell Evan that he said hi.

Colin Moock

I've seen Colin Moock present a number of times over the years and he's always done a great job very clearly explaining technical concepts. This presentation was no different as Colin went through quite a number of new features in the latest ECMAScript standard, which we are likely to see in a future version of ActionScript. Moock had the slides of his presentation up online for quite some time now (which can be found here) and as an example of how quickly things have changed recently a number of features for ECMAScript 4 have since been deferred or removed. It was a disappointment to some in the crowd to see some of what would have been cool features such as method overloading deferred for a future version of ActionScript.

I asked Colin about all the deferrals during the Q&A and he mentioned that for a lot of these items it was just a matter of timing as they are looking to December to finalize the ECMAScript.

Interesting enough at the end of the presentation Colin Moock talked to Jim Corbett, who's a Flash Player engineer at Adobe, asking him if anything in the presentation was new to him. Jim said some recent deferred and removed items he hadn't heard about yet and he showed some frustration with ECMAScript 4, wishing it would stop changing and be finalized.
Jim Corbett in the audience in the blue and grey, talking to Colin Moock about ECMAScript 4 and ActionScript.
That's Jim Corbett in the blue and grey.

 

Comments

Brent

Brent wrote on 04/23/08 9:58 AM

Do you mean method overloading? I think overriding is already in AS3.
Matthew Fabb

Matthew Fabb wrote on 04/23/08 12:50 PM

Thanks Brent, I meant overloading not overriding.
simonconlin

simonconlin wrote on 04/24/08 4:06 AM

great review, and the start to Colin's presentation was very noble and refreshing
SEo Companies

SEo Companies wrote on 08/06/09 2:09 AM

this is nice information need to know more
Business answering service

Business answering service wrote on 08/06/09 5:24 AM

Where can i have more info on this ?

Regards

Christopher
lookout dog car seat

lookout dog car seat wrote on 08/06/09 5:26 AM

this is nice information need to know more
beat drug testing

beat drug testing wrote on 08/06/09 6:42 AM

Great Work !

Regards

Gerry
Photo to Pop Art

Photo to Pop Art wrote on 08/06/09 6:58 AM

Great Work !

Regards

Bony
Program Trading

Program Trading wrote on 08/06/09 6:59 AM

Thanks for such a nice post.

Regards

{Amit}
magnetic calendars

magnetic calendars wrote on 08/08/09 1:58 AM

You seem to have got the niche from the root, Awesome work

thanks
Bartholomew
get pregnant fast

get pregnant fast wrote on 02/01/10 10:59 PM

I am to submit a report on this niche your post has been very very helpfull
tungsten wedding bands

tungsten wedding bands wrote on 03/03/10 11:41 PM

Yeah, I was pretty disappointed when I read about this. It would have been so nice to have method overloading implemented. Oh well, all good things will come in I suppose!
San Francisco Web Design

San Francisco Web Design wrote on 03/08/10 12:21 AM

Were they ever able to get around to fixing up the script with the new features like deferred overloading? I would love to sit down and have a 2-minute chat about some other features that would probably make it better. It's great that you got to be there.

Leave a comment

Tell us about yourself
(required field)
(required field)
Comment and preferences

Leave this field empty: